Wednesday, February 22, 2012

The Two "David"s

In the Baroque period, we see a shift in ideals from the Renaissance Period. Renaissance art usually depicted moments before important events took place, with little to no (implied) movement. Art in the Baroque period, however, took a wide turn from those thoughts with dramatic poses in every scene and is recognized by rich colors and stark contrasts in black and white. Taking a look at the Michelangelo’s “David” from the Renaissance Period in the 16th century and comparing it to Bernini’s “David” from the Baroque Period in the 17th century can give us clear indications as to what was sought after in each century. Both statue depict the same young man, David; the Biblical hero who defeated the giant of a man, Goliath, with his sling and five stones.
At first glance, one can immediately see a difference in the way the two Davids are posed; Michelangelo’s is calm, almost reflective, with an air of relaxed composure; even though this statue depicts David, the young, clever man who defeats a seven foot tall colossus, it does not seem to tell his story. The tranquil form certainly does not look like someone who is about to battle or just battled a near monster, the contrapposto way of his arms and leg suggest a state of thinking, revealing the ideals of the Renaissance Period in idealism and humanism. Contrastingly, Bernini’s “David” shows the man at the height of the action. Both figures demonstrate each of the artists’ superb skills with details down to the slightest vein, but Bernini’s David depicts him in a dramatic pose. One can see the stress and anticipates the next action, a winding up of the arm just before it releases the sling creates a visually stimulating experience none had witnessed before. Michelangelo’s is much more formal in the fact that it is really only meant to be viewed from one side (a look at the back reveals nothing more than the rest of the man’s body), Bernini’s, on the other hand, challenges the viewer to walk around it. Looking at their faces, the contemplative “David” by Michelangelo seems composed and engulfed in thought. Little expression is visible, the blank stare gives the viewer little into the mind of this man and what he is about to do. Conversely, Bernini’s “David” is full of emotion, with a tense mouth and heated stare, one can clearly see the state of alarm he is in and that this is a story of intense battle. Another difference is that one is Michelangelo’s David is naked, while Bernini’s remains clothed, which could be a reflection of the Renaissances ideals in the humanism (the appreciation of the human form) while Bernini showed his appreciation of the human form thorough his use of the dramatic pose.
Both works reveal the ideals from one period to another. I found it very interesting the beauty in both in different ways. Michelangelo sought the splendor in perfection, while Bernini sought to evoke a feeling of instructiveness with the viewer.

3 comments:

  1. I really enjoyed your blog. I liked what you explain about idealism, humanism in Michelangelo's David. When I see the Bernini's David,it looks really active and i can see every stories in this statue. However, Mechelangelo's David looks normal but there is idealism and humanism in detail.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is so interesting to read other peoples blog. You pointed out something obvious that I had missed. Michelangelos David was not clothed and Bernini's was. I was studying the sculptures so intensely I missed that! So thank you! Both are beautiful pieces that have such dramatically different effects!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how you pointed out the lack of story related details in Michelangelo's David. I too noticed this when I was comparing the pieces for my blog. Bernini's inclusion of the loaded sling and the armor he had taken off really lets the viewer know the figure is the David from the Bible story.

    ReplyDelete